Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Metaplanet adds 1,241 Bitcoin, total holdings now 6,796 BTC

    May 12, 2025

    Spot Bitcoin ETFs see three-week inflow streak totalling $5.8 billion

    May 12, 2025

    Crypto wallet maker Ledger regains control of Discord after phishing attack

    May 12, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Block Hub News
    • Lithosphere News Releases
    • Altcoins
      • Bitcoin
      • Coinbase
      • Litecoin
    • Crypto
    • Ethereum
    • Blockchain
    Block Hub News
    You are at:Home » Solidity 0.6.x features: try/catch statement
    Ethereum

    Solidity 0.6.x features: try/catch statement

    Olivia MartinezBy Olivia MartinezApril 22, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



    The try/catch syntax introduced in 0.6.0 is arguably the biggest leap in error handling capabilities in Solidity, since reason strings for revert and require were released in v0.4.22. Both try and catch have been reserved keywords since v0.5.9 and now we can use them to handle failures in external function calls without rolling back the complete transaction (state changes in the called function are still rolled back, but the ones in the calling function are not).

    We are moving one step away from the purist “all-or-nothing” approach in a transaction lifecycle, which falls short of practical behaviour we often want.

    Handling external call failures

    The try/catch statement allows you to react on failed external calls and contract creation calls, so you cannot use it for internal function calls. Note that to wrap a public function call within the same contract with try/catch, it can be made external by calling the function with this..

    The example below demonstrates how try/catch is used in a factory pattern where contract creation might fail. The following CharitySplitter contract requires a mandatory address property _owner in its constructor.

    pragma solidity ^0.6.1;
    
    contract CharitySplitter {
        address public owner;
        constructor (address _owner) public {
            require(_owner != address(0), "no-owner-provided");
            owner = _owner;
        }
    }
    

    There is a factory contract — CharitySplitterFactory which is used to create and manage instances of CharitySplitter. In the factory we can wrap the new CharitySplitter(charityOwner) in a try/catch as a failsafe for when that constructor might fail because of an empty charityOwner being passed.

    pragma solidity ^0.6.1;
    import "./CharitySplitter.sol";
    contract CharitySplitterFactory {
        mapping (address => CharitySplitter) public charitySplitters;
        uint public errorCount;
        event ErrorHandled(string reason);
        event ErrorNotHandled(bytes reason);
        function createCharitySplitter(address charityOwner) public {
            try new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
                returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
            {
                charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
            } catch {
                errorCount++;
            }
        }
    }
    

    Note that with try/catch, only exceptions happening inside the external call itself are caught. Errors inside the expression are not caught, for example if the input parameter for the new CharitySplitter is itself part of an internal call, any errors it raises will not be caught. Sample demonstrating this behaviour is the modified createCharitySplitter function. Here the CharitySplitter constructor input parameter is retrieved dynamically from another function — getCharityOwner. If that function reverts, in this example with “revert-required-for-testing”, that will not be caught in the try/catch statement.

    function createCharitySplitter(address _charityOwner) public {
        try new CharitySplitter(getCharityOwner(_charityOwner, false))
            returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        } catch (bytes memory reason) {
            ...
        }
    }
    function getCharityOwner(address _charityOwner, bool _toPass)
            internal returns (address) {
        require(_toPass, "revert-required-for-testing");
        return _charityOwner;
    }
    

    Retrieving the error message

    We can further extend the try/catch logic in the createCharitySplitter function to retrieve the error message if one was emitted by a failing revert or require and emit it in an event. There are two ways to achieve this:

    1. Using catch Error(string memory reason)

    function createCharitySplitter(address _charityOwner) public {
        try new CharitySplitter(_charityOwner) returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        }
        catch Error(string memory reason)
        {
            errorCount++;
            CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter = new
                CharitySplitter(msg.sender);
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
            // Emitting the error in event
            emit ErrorHandled(reason);
        }
        catch
        {
            errorCount++;
        }
    }
    

    Which emits the following event on a failed constructor require error:

    CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorHandled(
        reason: 'no-owner-provided' (type: string)
    )
    

    2. Using catch (bytes memory reason)

    function createCharitySplitter(address charityOwner) public {
        try new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
            returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        }
        catch (bytes memory reason) {
            errorCount++;
            emit ErrorNotHandled(reason);
        }
    }
    

    Which emits the following event on a failed constructor require error:

    CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorNotHandled(
      reason: hex'08c379a0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000116e6f2d6f776e65722d70726f7669646564000000000000000000000000000000' (type: bytes)
    

    The above two methods for retrieving the error string produce a similar result. The difference is that the second method does not ABI-decode the error string. The advantage of the second method is that it is also executed if ABI decoding the error string fails or if no reason was provided.

    Future plans

    There are plans to release support for error types meaning we will be able to declare errors in a similar way to events allowing us to catch different type of errors, for example:

    catch CustomErrorA(uint data1) { … }
    catch CustomErrorB(uint[] memory data2) { … }
    catch {}
    



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleLummis ‘₿ig things’ tweet refers to subcommittee, not Bitcoin Reserve
    Next Article We got a Vine memecoin before we got the app back
    Olivia Martinez

    Related Posts

    Ethereum (ETH) sees major uptick as Pectra upgrade goes live

    May 8, 2025

    Allocation Update – Q1 2025

    May 8, 2025

    CVE-2025-30147 – The curious case of subgroup check on Besu

    May 7, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Demo
    Latest Posts

    Metaplanet adds 1,241 Bitcoin, total holdings now 6,796 BTC

    May 12, 20250 Views

    Spot Bitcoin ETFs see three-week inflow streak totalling $5.8 billion

    May 12, 20250 Views

    Crypto wallet maker Ledger regains control of Discord after phishing attack

    May 12, 20250 Views

    Tokyo-listed Beat Holdings to boost its Bitcoin ETF exposure fivefold, seeks $34m cap

    May 12, 20250 Views
    Don't Miss

    TAO and Arbitrum investors rush to buy into 1Fuel presale before anticipated rally

    By Isabella TaylorApril 22, 2025

    For years, Arbitrum and TAO have dominated the market as two of the best altcoins…

    Slasher Ghost, and Other Developments in Proof of Stake

    April 24, 2025

    Bitcoin breaks $93,000 amid rumors that Saudi, UAE, or Qatar is buying

    April 23, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Demo
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Our Picks

    Metaplanet adds 1,241 Bitcoin, total holdings now 6,796 BTC

    May 12, 2025

    Spot Bitcoin ETFs see three-week inflow streak totalling $5.8 billion

    May 12, 2025

    Crypto wallet maker Ledger regains control of Discord after phishing attack

    May 12, 2025
    Most Popular

    TAO and Arbitrum investors rush to buy into 1Fuel presale before anticipated rally

    April 22, 202528 Views

    Slasher Ghost, and Other Developments in Proof of Stake

    April 24, 202519 Views

    Bitcoin breaks $93,000 amid rumors that Saudi, UAE, or Qatar is buying

    April 23, 202510 Views
    © 2025 - 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.