Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Dark stablecoins will emerge, here’s why

    May 12, 2025

    Bitcoin SV holders attempt legal comeback against Binance

    May 12, 2025

    Top 3 catalysts for Bitcoin, altcoin prices this week

    May 11, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Block Hub News
    • Lithosphere News Releases
    • Altcoins
      • Bitcoin
      • Coinbase
      • Litecoin
    • Crypto
    • Ethereum
    • Blockchain
    Block Hub News
    You are at:Home » Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage
    Ethereum

    Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage

    Olivia MartinezBy Olivia MartinezApril 22, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Summary: In some situations, variables can overwrite other variables in storage.

    Affected Solidity compiler versions: 0.1.6 to 0.4.3 (including 0.4.4 pre-release versions)

    Detailed description:

    Storage variables that are smaller than 256 bits are packed together into the same 256 bit slot if they can fit. If a value larger than what is allowed by the type is assigned to the first variable, that value will overwrite the second variable.

    This means if an attacker can cause an overflow in the value of the first variable, then the second variable can be modified. Creating an overflow in the first variable is possible using arithmetics or by directly passing in a value from the call data (values in call data are aligned to 32 bytes, and padding is neither verified nor enforced).

    Contracts that only use the types listed below for state variables are not affected. Arrays, mappings and structs (based on those following types) are also not affected:

    • signed integers, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • bytesNN types, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • unsigned integers (uint) of 256 bits

    Contracts with types smaller than 256 bits that are never next to each other (note that state variables of base contracts are “pulled in”) are not affected.

    The Ethereum multisignature wallet contract is not affected.
    Note that addresses take up 160 bits, so contracts that only use addresses and 256-bit types are safe. Additionally, addresses and booleans are almost never manipulated via arithmetic operations in practice, so contracts using only addresses, booleans and 256 bit types should also be safe.

    The following contracts may be affected:
    Contracts containing two or more contiguous state variables where the sum of their sizes is less than 256 bits and the first state variable is not a signed integer and not of bytesNN type.

    Types smaller than 256 bits include:
    bool, enums, uint8, …, uint248, int8, …, int248, address, any contract type

    Recommended action:

    • Recompile contracts that have not yet been deployed using at least Solidity release 0.4.4 (not the pre-release or nightly version).
    • Deactivate, remove funds from, or upgrade already deployed contracts.

    This vulnerability was found by [github.com/catageek](https://github.com/catageek): [https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306)



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleMatter Labs sued by BANKEX over alleged theft of technology
    Next Article MicroStrategy bitcoin purchases aren’t stopping premium decline
    Olivia Martinez

    Related Posts

    Ethereum (ETH) sees major uptick as Pectra upgrade goes live

    May 8, 2025

    Allocation Update – Q1 2025

    May 8, 2025

    CVE-2025-30147 – The curious case of subgroup check on Besu

    May 7, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Demo
    Latest Posts

    Dark stablecoins will emerge, here’s why

    May 12, 20250 Views

    Bitcoin SV holders attempt legal comeback against Binance

    May 12, 20250 Views

    Top 3 catalysts for Bitcoin, altcoin prices this week

    May 11, 20250 Views

    Shiba Inu pattern points to 190% surge asv burn rate rises

    May 11, 20250 Views
    Don't Miss

    TAO and Arbitrum investors rush to buy into 1Fuel presale before anticipated rally

    By Isabella TaylorApril 22, 2025

    For years, Arbitrum and TAO have dominated the market as two of the best altcoins…

    Slasher Ghost, and Other Developments in Proof of Stake

    April 24, 2025

    Bitcoin breaks $93,000 amid rumors that Saudi, UAE, or Qatar is buying

    April 23, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Demo
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Our Picks

    Dark stablecoins will emerge, here’s why

    May 12, 2025

    Bitcoin SV holders attempt legal comeback against Binance

    May 12, 2025

    Top 3 catalysts for Bitcoin, altcoin prices this week

    May 11, 2025
    Most Popular

    TAO and Arbitrum investors rush to buy into 1Fuel presale before anticipated rally

    April 22, 202528 Views

    Slasher Ghost, and Other Developments in Proof of Stake

    April 24, 202519 Views

    Bitcoin breaks $93,000 amid rumors that Saudi, UAE, or Qatar is buying

    April 23, 202510 Views
    © 2025 - 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.