Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    China central bank targets Solana over Shanghai advertising and canceled event

    November 6, 2026

    EIP-8037/EIP-8038 Glamsterdam | Ethereum Foundation Blog

    November 6, 2026

    Binance founder CZ warns of critical 10-year-old OpenSSH flaw

    November 6, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Block Hub News
    • Lithosphere News Releases
    • Altcoins
      • Bitcoin
      • Coinbase
      • Litecoin
    • Crypto
    • Ethereum
    • Blockchain
    Block Hub News
    You are at:Home » Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage
    Ethereum

    Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage

    Olivia MartinezBy Olivia MartinezNovember 5, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Summary: In some situations, variables can overwrite other variables in storage.

    Affected Solidity compiler versions: 0.1.6 to 0.4.3 (including 0.4.4 pre-release versions)

    Detailed description:

    Storage variables that are smaller than 256 bits are packed together into the same 256 bit slot if they can fit. If a value larger than what is allowed by the type is assigned to the first variable, that value will overwrite the second variable.

    This means if an attacker can cause an overflow in the value of the first variable, then the second variable can be modified. Creating an overflow in the first variable is possible using arithmetics or by directly passing in a value from the call data (values in call data are aligned to 32 bytes, and padding is neither verified nor enforced).

    Contracts that only use the types listed below for state variables are not affected. Arrays, mappings and structs (based on those following types) are also not affected:

    • signed integers, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • bytesNN types, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • unsigned integers (uint) of 256 bits

    Contracts with types smaller than 256 bits that are never next to each other (note that state variables of base contracts are “pulled in”) are not affected.

    The Ethereum multisignature wallet contract is not affected.
    Note that addresses take up 160 bits, so contracts that only use addresses and 256-bit types are safe. Additionally, addresses and booleans are almost never manipulated via arithmetic operations in practice, so contracts using only addresses, booleans and 256 bit types should also be safe.

    The following contracts may be affected:
    Contracts containing two or more contiguous state variables where the sum of their sizes is less than 256 bits and the first state variable is not a signed integer and not of bytesNN type.

    Types smaller than 256 bits include:
    bool, enums, uint8, …, uint248, int8, …, int248, address, any contract type

    Recommended action:

    • Recompile contracts that have not yet been deployed using at least Solidity release 0.4.4 (not the pre-release or nightly version).
    • Deactivate, remove funds from, or upgrade already deployed contracts.

    This vulnerability was found by [github.com/catageek](https://github.com/catageek): [https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306)



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleCrypto crash liquidates $954M in longs and $127M in shorts
    Next Article Bitcoin ETF inflows return as US crypto legislation faces delays
    Olivia Martinez

    Related Posts

    EIP-8037/EIP-8038 Glamsterdam | Ethereum Foundation Blog

    November 6, 2026

    Security alert – All geth nodes crash due to an out of memory bug

    November 6, 2026

    The Ethereum network is currently undergoing a DoS attack

    November 6, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Demo
    Latest Posts

    China central bank targets Solana over Shanghai advertising and canceled event

    November 6, 20260 Views

    EIP-8037/EIP-8038 Glamsterdam | Ethereum Foundation Blog

    November 6, 20260 Views

    Binance founder CZ warns of critical 10-year-old OpenSSH flaw

    November 6, 20260 Views

    Security alert – All geth nodes crash due to an out of memory bug

    November 6, 20260 Views
    Don't Miss

    Bubblemaps accuses Pump.fun influencer Ethan of $125K scam

    By James WilsonOctober 11, 2026

    Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps has accused cryptocurrency influencer Ethan (@0xEthan) of allegedly earning approximately $125,000…

    Core DAO leadership changes as validators take control

    October 28, 2026

    Solana’s faster finality is live. What changes for users?

    October 27, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Demo
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Our Picks

    China central bank targets Solana over Shanghai advertising and canceled event

    November 6, 2026

    EIP-8037/EIP-8038 Glamsterdam | Ethereum Foundation Blog

    November 6, 2026

    Binance founder CZ warns of critical 10-year-old OpenSSH flaw

    November 6, 2026
    Most Popular

    Bubblemaps accuses Pump.fun influencer Ethan of $125K scam

    October 11, 20266 Views

    Core DAO leadership changes as validators take control

    October 28, 20265 Views

    Solana’s faster finality is live. What changes for users?

    October 27, 20265 Views
    © 2026 - 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.